1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 156 Conn.
  5. 156 Conn. 378 (1968)
 

STATE v. SMITH

156 Conn. 378 (1968)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. STUART B. SMITH ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 23, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles G. Karanian, with whom, on the brief, was Daniel J. Hagearty, for the appellants (defendants).

David B. Salzman, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was George R. Tiernan, state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

ALCORN, HOUSE, COTTER, THIM and RYAN, JS.

RYAN, J.

The defendants, Stuart B. Smith and George H. Lombra, in a trial to the jury, were convicted of breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a crime therein in violation of § 53-76 of the General Statutes. At the trial, each of the defendants was represented by different counsel. In this appeal the same counsel appears for both defendants.

The defendants' first four assignments of error are addressed to paragraphs of the finding, each...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases