CARNER v. RATNER

Nos. 67-486, 67-487.

207 So.2d 310 (1968)

Jack CARNER, Appellant, v. Nat RATNER, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Cypen, Arnold Nevins and Ira M. Elegant, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Kaplan & Shapiro, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Jack Carner's two interlocutory appeals to challenge two orders of the chancellor below have been consolidated.

His first argument on appeal is that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure have abrogated a pure bill for discovery.

We find no specific language in the Rules of Civil Procedure indicating an intent to abrogate, or abolish, the traditional right of a court to entertain pure bills of discovery. In First Nat. Bank of Miami v. Dade...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases