1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 159 S.E.2d
  5. 159 S.E.2d 351 (1968)
 

STEIN v. CAPITAL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC.

No. 525.

159 S.E.2d 351 (1968)

273 N.C. 77

Howard L. STEIN, Petitioner, v. CAPITAL OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., and James A. Bridger and Clawson A. Hicks, Respondents.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jordan, Morris & Hoke, Raleigh, for respondent Clawson A. Hicks.

Teague, Johnson, Patterson, Dilthey & Clay, by Robert M. Clay and Bob W. Bowers, Raleigh, for appellee Howard L. Stein.

LAKE, Justice.

The documents entitled "Agreement" and "Stock Voting Proxy" were executed contemporaneously as part of a single agreement or plan. They must, therefore, be construed together in order to determine what that agreement or plan contemplated. Apparently, the purpose of the paper designated "Stock Voting Proxy" was to make the one entitled "Agreement" effective, the parties seemingly being of the opinion that without the "Stock Voting Proxy" Hicks would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases