1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 38 Wis.2d
  5. 38 Wis.2d 468 (1968)
 

CONKLIN v. HORNER

38 Wis.2d 468 (1968)

CONKLIN, Respondent, v. HORNER and another, Appellants. [Case No. 251.] THURLBY, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants. [Case No. 252.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 9, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Heide, Sheldon, Hartley & Thom and W. A. Sheldon, all of Kenosha, and oral argument by W. A. Sheldon.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kenney, Korf & Pfeil of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Richard H. Pfeil.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The defendants' claim is based upon our decision in Wilcox v. Wilcox (1965), 26 Wis.2d 617, 133 N.W.2d 408, where we abandoned the choice-of-law rule of lex loci delicti and adopted in its stead a more flexible methodology based upon the qualitative analysis of the contacts that one or more jurisdictions might have with the relevant facts. We adopted the general approach of Babcock v. Jackson (1963...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases