1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 29 A.D.2d
  5. 29 A.D.2d 477 (1968)
 

SIEGEL v. KRANIS

29 A.D.2d 477 (1968)

Moe Siegel et al., Appellants, v. Jack Kranis, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 25, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foley & Hickey (Richard G. Hickey of counsel), for appellants.

Michael J. Horowitz and Murray A. Gordon for respondent.

BELDOCK, P. J., CHRIST, RABIN and MUNDER, JJ., concur.

HOPKINS, J.

The action is in malpractice against an attorney. Plaintiffs' complaint, consisting of two causes, has been dismissed as barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 5). This appeal challenges the correctness of the determination.

The plaintiffs Moe Siegel and Ethel Siegel are husband and wife and the plaintiff Burton Siegel is their son. On February 15, 1960 an automobile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases