1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 250 Md.
  5. 250 Md. 250 (1968)
 

ED JACOBSEN, JR., INC. v. WHITE

[No. 301, September Term, 1967.]

250 Md. 250 (1968)

241 A.2d 723

ED JACOBSEN, JR., INC. v. WHITE, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 31, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn E. Diggs, with whom were Bowen & Diggs on the brief, for appellant.

Allen Jones, Jr., with whom were Wilkes & Artis, William N. Dunphy and Dunphy, Sanders & Anderson on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant failed completely to meet the requirements of Maryland Rule 828, printing no part of the transcript. The appeal is dismissed under Rule 828 and Rule 835 b (5).

Had we decided the case on the merits, the judgment appealed from would have been affirmed.

Appeal dismissed; costs to be paid by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases