FENESTRA, INC. v. MERLE PATNODE CO.

No. 13.

40 Wis.2d 453 (1968)

162 N.W.2d 23

FENESTRA, INC., Respondent, v. MERLE PATNODE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 29, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Phillip Berman of Milwaukee.

No brief or appearance for respondent.


WILKIE, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal:

(1) Whether the findings of the lower court were against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.

(2) Whether the parol-evidence rule required the exclusion of the letter of June 9, 1966.

The contract involved is the purchase order of defendant-appellant to the plaintiff-respondent. Appellant contends that the trial court should have dismissed the complaint of the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases