1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 395 F.2d
  5. 395 F.2d 92 (1968)
 

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP. v. IONIC ELECTROSTATIC CORP.

No. 10347.

395 F.2d 92 (1968)

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP., Appellee, v. IONIC ELECTROSTATIC CORPORATION, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 11, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward F. Levy, New York City (John S. McDaniel, Jr., Lawrence A. Kaufman, and Cable & McDaniel, Baltimore, Md., on the brief) for appellant.

James P. Hume, Chicago, Ill., Howard W. Clement, Chicago, Ill., Verne A. Trask, Indianapolis, Ind., and Anderson, Coe & King, Baltimore, Md., on the brief for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges.

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

The defendant has appealed from an order holding it in contempt of an injunctive order entered in a patent case. The contempt finding is premised upon a finding that certain devices for use in electrostatic spray painting systems are the equivalent of certain other devices previously found to infringe the plaintiff's patents and that the sale and use of the new devices were proscribed by the terms of the injunction. In light of the prior art...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases