1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 259 Cal.App.2d
  5. 259 Cal.App.2d 219 (1968)
 

CITY OF CYPRESS v. NEW AMSTERDAM CAS. CO.

Docket No. 8610.

259 Cal.App.2d 219 (1968)

66 Cal. Rptr. 357

CITY OF CYPRESS, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

February 20, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ives, Kirwan & Dibble and John Brevidoro for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Rutan & Tucker and Leonard A. Hampel for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

McCABE, P.J.

The order granting the motion to strike portions of the answer to the complaint being non-appealable, the attempted appeal therefrom must be and is hereby ordered dismissed.

The dispute grows out of the purported obligation of the defendant and cross-complainant New Amsterdam Casualty Company to complete certain improvements in a subdivision after the default of the developer of that subdivision to do so, or in the alternative to indemnify the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases