STAMATE v. PETERSON


444 P.2d 30 (1968)

Joe F. STAMATE and Nellie B. Stamate, Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. Kenneth D. PETERSON and Marjory J. Peterson, Husband and Wife; Roy Brown; and James Wheelan, Defendants, and Martin A. Peterson and Carolina Peterson, Husband and Wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon. In Banc.

Decided July 24, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Smallmon, Hermiston, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Brewer & Smallmon, Hermiston.

Robert T. Mautz, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondents. On the briefs were Cunha & Mautz, Pendleton.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, JJ.


Argued and Submitted at Pendleton May 7, 1968.

GOODWIN, Justice.

Grantees of certain mortgage debtors, whose land had been sold on foreclosure, appeal from the order directing the sheriff to execute a deed to the mortgagee-purchasers. Error is assigned to the trial court's refusal to honor a purported notice of intent to redeem within one year.

The mode of redeeming is set forth in ORS 23.570. The right to redeem is strictly statutory, equitable rights...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases