PER CURIAM.
The appellants, who were defendants in the trial court, suffered a final judgment in the amount of $1500 after a jury trial. On this appeal the principal point presented urges that the appellants are entitled to a reversal because the proof at trial did not establish liability under the allegations of the complaint. The complaint was framed upon a theory of negligent nuisance and trespass. Appellants rely principally upon Beckman v. Marshall, Fla. 1956...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.