1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 40 Wis.2d
  5. 40 Wis.2d 408 (1968)
 

KINSMAN v. PANEK

No. 16.

40 Wis.2d 408 (1968)

162 N.W.2d 27

KINSMAN, Respondent, v. PANEK and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 29, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Genrich, Terwilliger, Wakeen, Piehler & Conway, attorneys, and Roger Rouse of counsel, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Mr. Rouse.

For the respondent there was a brief by Weber & Bolte and Richard J. Weber, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard J. Weber.

HEFFERNAN, J.

In reviewing a trial court's order following motions after verdict, whether it sustains or sets aside a jury's verdict the same test is to be applied on appeal, namely:

"... that when there is any credible evidence which, under any reasonable view, fairly admits of an inference that supports the jury's finding, neither the trial court nor this court should change the jury's finding." Rodenkirch v. Johnson (1960), 9 Wis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases