TAYLOR v. PEARL


439 P.2d 7 (1968)

W.R. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. T.K. PEARL, Defendant-Respondent, R.W. Pickell, Intervenor-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided March 27, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Ray Rhoten, Salem, argued the cause for intervenor-appellant. On the briefs were Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, Salem.

John S. Horton, Albany, argued the cause for defendant-respondent. With him on the brief were Weatherford, Thompson, Horton & Jordan, Albany.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LANGTRY, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding to determine whether the intervenor, R.W. PicKell has an attorney's retaining lien (ORS 87.495) on a joint savings account deposited in the name R.W. PicKell and John S. Horton, defendant's attorney.

This matter was before us in Taylor v. Pearl, 244 Or. 81, 415 P.2d 757 (1966). In that case we remanded the cause for further proceedings to determine whether PicKell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases