1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 249 Md.
  5. 249 Md. 194 (1968)
 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY v. SHIENTAL

[No. 136, September Term, 1967.]

249 Md. 194 (1968)

238 A.2d 912

MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL v. SHIENTAL, ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 6, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Christopher Malone, Assistant Attorney General, with whom was David L. Cahoon, County Attorney, on the brief, for appellant.

C. Edward Nicholson, with whom was James R. Trimm on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.

HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this Montgomery County zoning case, the County Council sitting as the District Council denied the application of Sol and Rose Shiental for a reclassification of a tract of land from rural residential to light industrial. The Circuit Court (Pugh, J.) reversed the decision of the County Council and it appealed to this Court. The question here is (a) whether the refusal of the zoning authority to reclassify the property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases