1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 284 F.Supp.
  5. 284 F.Supp. 158 (1968)
 

McCORMACK v. THEO. HAMM BREWING CO.

No. 5-66-77 Civil.

284 F.Supp. 158 (1968)

George R. McCORMACK, d/b/a Hamm's Sales Company, a partnership, Plaintiff, v. THEO. HAMM BREWING CO., a Minnesota corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fifth Division.

March 11, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reavill, Neimeyer, Johnson, Fredin & Killen, by Conrad M. Fredin, Duluth, Minn., for plaintiff.

Maun, Hazel, Green, Hayes, Simon & Aretz, by Joseph A. Maun, Lawrence J. Hayes, and John A. Murray, St. Paul, Minn., for defendant.

MILES W. LORD, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM

Defendant has moved for dismissal of several of the claims under Rules 12 and 56. Alternatively, defendant has moved the Court for an order requiring a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12 (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In view of the Court's decision to grant the motion for a more definite statement, it would perhaps be more orderly to defer decision on the other motions. However, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases