1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 212 Pa.Super.
  5. 212 Pa.Super. 227 (1968)
 

BETHEL PARK BORO. v. LOWY et ux.

212 Pa.Super. 227 (1968)

Bethel Park Borough v. Lowy et ux., Appellants.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

June 7, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G.N. Evashavik, with him Parker, Evashwick & Brieger, for appellants.

Owen B. McManus, with him Brandt, Riester, Brandt and Malone, for appellee.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, and HANNUM, JJ. (HOFFMAN and SPAULDING, JJ., absent).

OPINION PER CURIAM, June 7, 1968:

Order affirmed.

CONCURRING OPINION BY MONTGOMERY, J.:

I concur with the majority in affirming the lower court with a per curiam order for the reason that it is not within our power to review this case on its merits. Under Commonwealth v. Hanzlik, 191 Pa.Super. 460, 157 A.2d 97 (1960), and the Act of August 14, 1963...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases