MATSUMURA v. EILERT

Nos. 39246, 39247, 39248, 39249, 39250.

74 Wn.2d 362 (1968)

444 P.2d 806

GEORGE MATSUMURA, Respondent, v. NORMAN L. EILERT et al., Defendants, DOROTHY HUYCK et al., Appellants. MIKE HATTORI et al., Respondents, v. NORMAN L. EILERT et al., Defendants, DOROTHY HUYCK et al., Appellants. TONY MAYEDA, Respondent, v. NORMAN L. EILERT et al., Defendants, DOROTHY HUYCK et al., Appellants. ROBERT ROLOFF, Respondent, v. NORMAN L. EILERT et al., Defendants, DOROTHY HUYCK et al., Appellants. HIRO YAMAMOTO, Respondent, v. NORMAN L. EILERT et al., Defendants, DOROTHY HUYCK et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

August 29, 1968.


HALE, J.

Before the sins of an agent can be visited upon his principal, the agency must be first established. Huyck & Sons, farmers in Lompoc, California, sold 400 sacks of beans for delivery to Empire Seed Company in Othello. One Leo Sullivan, acting as a sort of intermediary in Lompoc, negotiated the sale and arranged shipment. Empire Seed then sold the beans to plaintiffs, farmers in the Columbia Basin area, who planted them. Although of good quality, the beans...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases