1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 40 Wis.2d
  5. 40 Wis.2d 390 (1968)
 

VAN DE HEY v. CALUMET COUNTY

Nos. 137, 138.

40 Wis.2d 390 (1968)

161 N.W.2d 923

VAN DE HEY and wife, Respondents, v. CALUMET COUNTY and another, Appellants. DIETZEN and wife, Respondents, v. CALUMET COUNTY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 29, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants the cause was argued by Richard E. Barrett, assistant attorney general, and Kenneth M. Plaisted of New Holstein of counsel, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondents there was a brief by Esler & Green of Kaukauna, attorneys, and Hugh F. Nelson of Appleton of counsel, and oral argument by John E. Esler.

HALLOWS, C. J.

The plaintiffs Gordon and Margaret Van De Hey, husband and wife, are the owners of a 186-acre farm on the north side of State Trunk Highway 114 and United States Highway 10 in Calumet county about two miles east of the city limits of Appleton. The farm had two sets of buildings and extended along the north side of the highway for approximately one-half mile. It had three driveways to the public highway. A strip of land abutting the highway comprising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases