BROWN v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BD.


101 N.J. Super. 299 (1968)

244 A.2d 310

EVELYN G. BROWN, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PHYLLIS BROWN AND JULIE BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JACK E. MEREDITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 11, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Howard H. Kestin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hoffmann & Humphreys, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Savage, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.


PER CURIAM.

We are in full agreement with the trial court's ruling, reported at 96 N.J.Super. 91 (Law Div. 1967), that the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., does not apply to an accident occurring outside the State of New Jersey, even though the vehicle, the operation of which allegedly caused the accident, was an uninsured automobile registered in this State.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases