1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 39 Wis.2d
  5. 39 Wis.2d 342 (1968)
 

STATE EX REL. SCHULTER v. RORAFF

No. 314.

39 Wis.2d 342 (1968)

159 N.W.2d 25

STATE EX REL. SCHULTER, Appellant, v. RORAFF, County Judge, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 4, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Bosshard, Sundet & Doyle and Patrick R. Doyle, all of La Crosse, and oral argument by Patrick R. Doyle.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Burleigh Randolph, district attorney of La Crosse county.

HALLOWS, C. J.

The appeal raises several issues: (1) Is prohibition a proper remedy to test the jurisdiction of the county court and the adequacy of the complaint; (2) should the state be permanently prohibited from further proceeding in the criminal action; (3) is the complaint defective; and (4) is sec. 947.15, Stats., unconstitutional?

Writ of Prohibition.

We think the writ of prohibition was a proper remedy to test the jurisdiction of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases