1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 258 Cal.App.2d
  5. 258 Cal.App.2d 101 (1968)
 

SHONKOFF v. DANT INV. CO.

Docket No. 25088.

258 Cal.App.2d 101 (1968)

65 Cal. Rptr. 463

ALTA SHONKOFF, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DANT INVESTMENT CO., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

January 22, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis & Stein and Marvin E. Lewis for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Bledsoe, Smith, Cathcart, Johnson & Rogers and Robert A. Seligson for Defendant and Respondent.

DRAPER, P.J.

Jury verdict and judgment were for defendant in this personal injury action. Plaintiff's motion for new trial was denied. Her notice of appeal was filed within 60 days of notice of entry of judgment. But it recites that she appeals "from the order denying new trial." [1] On the ground that the order specified in the notice is not appealable, defendant moves to dismiss the appeal.

Since the 1915 amendment (Stats. 1915, ch. 116, p....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases