1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 99 N.J.
  5. 99 N.J. Super. 247 (1968)
 

BRENNAN ET ALS. v. BIBER

99 N.J. Super. 247 (1968)

239 A.2d 261

PATRICK BRENNAN, BRIAN BRENNAN AND SEAN BRENNAN, INFANTS BY THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MONICA BRENNAN, MONICA BRENNAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOHN T. BRENNAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HENRY BIBER AND HENRY STOCKHAMMER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 19, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel Crystal argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Cohn & Lifland, attorneys).

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for respondent Henry Biber (Messrs. Jung, Selikoff, Rathman & Dwyer, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Kole's opinion reported at 93 N.J.Super. 351 (Law Div. 1966).

Additionally, we dispose of a point not specifically discussed in the reported opinion. Plaintiffs contend that certain evidence rulings by the trial court and comments of the court generally relating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases