1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 99 N.J.
  5. 99 N.J. Super. 243 (1968)
 

De CICCO v. ANDERSON

99 N.J. Super. 243 (1968)

239 A.2d 259

JOSEPH DE CICCO AND JOSEPHINE DE CICCO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. LEOKODIA H. ANDERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 16, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. J. Roger Conant argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Eugene M. Purcell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Stevens & Mathias, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

In this negligence action plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Law Division. The judgment in favor of defendant was based upon a holding by the trial court that the negligence action was barred by the Workmen's Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-7 et seq. The propriety of this determination is the sole question presented on this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases