Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person; plaintiffs cross-move for summary judgment. The motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice to defendant's pleading in his answer a defense of lack of jurisdiction; the cross motion is dismissed as premature, no answer having yet been served (CPLR 3212, subd. [a]; Pisano v. County of Nassau,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ELMAN v. BELSON
58 Misc.2d 271 (1968)
Edward Elman et al., Copartners under the Name of Elman & Ornstein, Plaintiffs, v. Joseph Belson, Defendant.
Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 29, 1968
October 29, 1968
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Dannenberg, Hazen & Lake for defendant. Elman & Ornstein plaintiffs in person.
Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
