>
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

PETERS v. KUPIHEA

NO. 2828.

39 Haw. 327 (1952)

SARAH BUSH PETERS v. MARGARET H. KUPIHEA, ALSO KNOWN AS HATTIE KUPIHEA.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

Decided March 21, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.K. Aiu (also on the brief) for appellant.

E.E. Wiles (Mirikitani & Wiles on the brief) for appellee.

TOWSE, C.J., LE BARON AND STAINBACK, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT BY STAINBACK, J.

This case involves ownership of certain lands covered by Royal Patent 3919, Land Commission Award 3413B, issued to Kaaki. Both parties claim through Kaaki as a common source of title.

Kaaki died intestate in 1865 and on October 11, 1881, petition for the issuance of letters of administration was filed by his widow, Kalaoa, requesting the appointment of J. Kakina as administrator. The inventory filed in February, 1882,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    MIDLAND NATIONAL INSURANC | 117 Ga. App. 208 (1968) | aapp2081248 | Leagle.com
     

    MIDLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WRIGHT

    43361.

    117 Ga. App. 208 (1968)

    160 S.E.2d 262

    MIDLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WRIGHT et al.

    Court of Appeals of Georgia.

    Decided February 9, 1968.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Richardson, Doremus & Karsman, Stanley Karsman, for appellant.

    Kravitch & Hendrix, Bart E. Shea, Usher & Haupt, Reginald C. Haupt, Jr., Friedman, Haslam & Weiner, Tom Edenfield, for appellees.


    DEEN, Judge.

    1. In this declaratory judgment action the court is called upon to construe the following exclusionary provision in an automobile liability insurance policy: "This policy does not apply: . . . (d) under coverage A, to bodily injury to or sickness, disease or death of any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of (1) domestic employment by the insured, if benefits therefor are in whole or...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases