1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 261 Cal.App.2d
  5. 261 Cal.App.2d 50 (1968)
 

SUTFIN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Docket No. 11585.

261 Cal.App.2d 50 (1968)

67 Cal. Rptr. 665

ROY SUTFIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

April 11, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watt & Peckham and Reginald M. Watt for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Harry S. Fenton, Robert F. Carlson, Edward J. Connor, Jr., and Donald M. Pach for Defendant and Respondent.

REGAN, J.

In this action for damages for inverse condemnation, the trial court sustained the demurrer of defendant State of California, without leave to amend, stating plaintiffs' amended complaint failed to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's judgment that the action be dismissed with prejudice as to defendant State of California.

By their first amended complaint plaintiffs allege...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases