1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 251 S.C.
  5. 251 S.C. 49 (1968)
 

KEMMERLIN v. BLOOM

18768

251 S.C. 49 (1968)

159 S.E.2d 910

Tommy H. KEMMERLIN, Respondent, v. Sam BLOOM and Theta Bloom, d/b/a the Sportsman Restaurant, Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 7, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Fulmer, Barnes, Berry & Austin, of Columbia, for Appellants.

Messrs. Owens T. Cobb, Jr., of Lewis & Cobb and Donald V. Richardson III, of Whaley, McCutchen, Blanton & Richardson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Messrs. Fulmer, Barnes, Berry & Austin, of Columbia, for Appellants, in Reply.

March 7, 1968.

LEWIS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court requiring one of the defendants to submit to a pretrial oral examination by plaintiff concerning certain specified matters which are relevant to the proof of plaintiff's cause of action and peculiarly within the knowledge of the defendant. The order was issued under the provisions of Section 26-503, 1962 Code of Laws, the pertinent portion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases