1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 258 Cal.App.2d
  5. 258 Cal.App.2d 32 (1968)
 

BURKE v. CITY ETC. OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 24076.

258 Cal.App.2d 32 (1968)

65 Cal. Rptr. 539

BERNARD BURKE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

January 18, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herzstein, Maier & Carey and Kenneth S. Carey for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Thomas M. O'Conner, City Attorney, and George E. Baglin, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

DRAPER, P.J.

This action for declaratory relief was dismissed after the sustaining of demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs own real property in the Diamond Heights section of San Francisco. Believing the improvements on their lands to be assessed at too high a figure for the 1965-1966 tax year, they applied to the supervisors, sitting as a board of equalization, for reduction. The assessment was reduced by 15 percent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases