1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 51 N.J.
  5. 51 N.J. 230 (1968)
 

JACKSON v. HANKINSON AND BD. OF ED. OF NEW SHREWSBURY

51 N.J. 230 (1968)

238 A.2d 685

RALPH JACKSON, JR., AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RALPH JACKSON AND RALPH JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THOMAS HANKINSON AND THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 19, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas F. Shebell, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Thomas F. Shebell, attorney).

Mr. Joseph P. Rose argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Oppenheim & Oppenheim, attorneys; Mr. Daniel Oppenheim, of counsel; Mr. Albert E. Fershing, on the brief).

PER CURIAM:

In Jackson v. Hankinson, 94 N.J.Super. 505 (1967) the Appellate Division affirmed the judgment of no cause which had been returned by the jury in favor of the defendant Hankinson but reversed the directed judgment which had been entered by the trial court in favor of the defendant Board of Education. We granted certification. 50 N.J. 292 (1967). Without indicating approval...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases