1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 40 Wis.2d
  5. 40 Wis.2d 223 (1968)
 

STATE EX REL. EVANOW v. SERAPHIM

No. 150.

40 Wis.2d 223 (1968)

161 N.W.2d 369

STATE EX REL. EVANOW, Appellant, v. SERAPHIM, County Judge, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 1, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Howard G. Brown and Shellow, Shellow & Coffey, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Brown.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Harold B. Jackson, Jr., assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Cannon, district attorney.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The sole question in this case is whether it appears from the written complaint that there is probable cause to believe that the relator is guilty of burglary. Wisconsin statutory law requires that the complaint itself set forth the grounds for probable cause.1 This differs from federal court procedures where supporting affidavits may be used for the showing of probable cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases