1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 38 Wis.2d
  5. 38 Wis.2d 219 (1968)
 

PRENTICE v. ILHR DEPARTMENT

38 Wis.2d 219 (1968)

VILLAGE OF PRENTICE and another, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, LABOR & HUMAN RELATIONS and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 27, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Jenswold, Studt, Hanson, Clark & Kaufmann of Madison, and oral argument by John F. Jenswold.

For the respondent Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations the cause was argued by James P. Altman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondents Boho and Geng there was a brief by DeBardeleben & Donlin of Park Falls, and oral argument by Arthur DeBardeleben.

WILKIE, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether Boho and Geng were employees for workmen's compensation purposes at the time they sustained their injuries. This determination is a question of law if the facts are undisputed and if but one, if any, inference may reasonably be drawn from the evidence before the commission.1 On the other hand, it is well settled that "when facts are not in dispute but permit the drawing of different inferences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases