SCHULTZ v. MUELLER

No. 272.

39 Wis.2d 216 (1968)

159 N.W.2d 63

SCHULTZ, Respondent, v. MUELLER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 4, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Stephen J. Hajduch of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by D'Amato, Scherba & Nettesheim, and oral argument by James J. Caldwell, all of Waukesha.


HANLEY, J.

Defendant contends that she should be granted a new trial: (1) Because the jury verdict was perverse as being contrary to the law and to the evidence; and (2) in the interest of justice.

The defendant put in evidence tending to show that the driveway was graded in a defective manner so that the driveway gate on the fence surrounding her property would no longer open inward and that the driveway was already cracked. (The trial occurred roughly two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases