1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 102 N.J.
  5. 102 N.J. Super. 143 (1968)
 

CORPORATE DEV. SPE., INC. v. WARREN-TEED PHARM.

102 N.J. Super. 143 (1968)

245 A.2d 517

CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WARREN-TEED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 15, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent & Gross, attorneys).

Mr. Michael F. Spicer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Jamieson, Walsh, McCardell & Moore, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

In this action by a New Jersey corporation for breach of contract against a Delaware corporation with principal place of business in Ohio, we remanded for the taking of testimony to supplement the affidavits on the basis of which the Law Division had granted a motion to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction over defendant, and for findings of fact thereon. 99 N.J.Super. 493

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases