HUFF v. RUDOWSKI

Docket No. 3,686.

14 Mich. App. 229 (1968)

165 N.W.2d 289

HUFF v. RUDOWSKI

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided November 25, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Rosender, for plaintiff.

Rouse, Selby, Webber, Dickinson & Shaw (James H. Finney, of counsel), for defendant.


PER CURIAM:

In this action for personal injuries by a pedestrian against an automobile driver under the negligent and subsequent negligence theories, there was no affirmative testimony that the plaintiff had not continued observations of traffic coming from his right (north) after the initial observation thereof made immediately before he stepped off the curb to cross to the west side of the street. There was considerable other traffic at the intersection. The testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases