PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Guss Hamilton, appeals a summary denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule One (now 1.850, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A.). We reverse.
Defendant's motion alleges that he was not advised of his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. The trial court grounded its summary denial on the absence of any allegation of indigency citing King v. State, Fla.App. 1963,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.