1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 40 Wis.2d
  5. 40 Wis.2d 187 (1968)
 

STATE v. HARRELL

No. State 10.

40 Wis.2d 187 (1968)

161 N.W.2d 223

STATE, Respondent, v. HARRELL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 1, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Burton B. Polansky of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Harold B. Jackson, Jr., assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Cannon, district attorney.

WILKIE, J.

Two issues are presented for this court's consideration.

(1) Whether the defendant was informed that the sentence actually imposed could be imposed.

(2) Whether State v. Reppin1 requires a complete record of the advice given to a defendant concerning the sentence that could be imposed.

In State v. Reppin2 this court stated:

"Recently the American Bar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases