1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 31 A.D.2d
  5. 31 A.D.2d 195 (1968)
 

XEROX CORP. v. NEISES

31 A.D.2d 195 (1968)

Xerox Corporation, Respondent, v. John T. Neises et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 17, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haliburton Fales, 2d of counsel (Jeffrey A. Barist with him on the brief; White & Case, attorneys), for appellants.

Whitney North Seymour (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., James W. Harbison, Jr., and Anthony L. Fletcher with him on the brief; Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, attorneys), for respondent.

EAGER, J. P., and STEUER, J., concur with BASTOW, J.; McNALLY, J., dissents in opinion in which RABIN, J., concurs.

BASTOW, J.

This appeal presents the issue as to the extent that injunctive relief should be granted pendente lite to an employer against its former employee pursuant to the provisions of a writing executed by the employee during the period of employment.

The corporate defendant ("Dennison") and individual defendant ("Neises") — presently employer and employee — appeal from an order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases