1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 103 Ariz.
  5. 103 Ariz. 114 (1968)
 

DAVIS v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 9075-PR.

103 Ariz. 114 (1968)

437 P.2d 647

Ted R. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, and Merritt-Chapman and Scott Corporation, Defendant Employer, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona. In Banc.

February 21, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hirsch, Van Slyke & Ollason, by Lawrence Ollason, Tucson, for petitioner.

Shimmel, Hill, Kleindienst & Bishop, by Phil B. Hammond, Phoenix, for respondent, Merritt-Chapman and Scott Corporation.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, Phoenix, by Spencer K. Johnston, Tucson, and Robert D. Steckner, Phoenix, for respondent The Industrial Commission of Arizona.

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

Claimant Davis brought his writ of certiorari in the Court of Appeals to challenge the lawfulness of an award and findings of the Industrial Commission. The Commission had affirmed its previous award which denied claimant compensation for loss of earning capacity and allowed only compensation for unscheduled permanent partial disability. The Court of Appeals affirmed the award, and found that the evidence reasonably supported the Commission's findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases