1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 41 Wis.2d
  5. 41 Wis.2d 145 (1968)
 

SMITH v. STATE

No. State 14.

41 Wis.2d 145 (1968)

163 N.W.2d 8

SMITH, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 20, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Duane Herrick of Eau Claire.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Paul Leo Kelly, district attorney of Eau Claire county.

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Justice CONNOR T. HANSEN having taken no part in the decision upon this writ of error to review the judgment and the other members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice HALLOWS, Mr. Justice WILKIE, and Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed or a new trial ordered, and Mr, Justice BEILFUSS, Mr. Justice HANLEY, and Mr. Justice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases