STATE EX REL. LURTY v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 9073.

17 Ohio App. 2d 156 (1968)

THE STATE, EX REL. LURTY, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County.

Decided December 17, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold Ticktin, for relator.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. Walter Howdyshell and Mr. Robert J. Dodd, Jr., for respondent Industrial Commission.

Messrs. Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer and Mr. Joseph A. Rotolo, for respondent Eaton Yale & Towne, Inc.


Per Curiam.

Relator seeks an award for an impairment in earning capacity under the provisions of Section 4123.57 (A), Revised Code. Relator had a claim allowed for a dermatitis of the hands. He was employed as a "wet" grinder at the time, and since has been a "dry" grinder. The pay for the latter job is 31 cents per hour less than that received by the "wet" grinder.

The relator does not allege any present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases