1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 8 Ariz.
  5. 8 Ariz. App. 159 (1968)
 

BRATTON v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 183.

8 Ariz. App. 159 (1968)

444 P.2d 450

Lee BRATTON, dba Lee Bratton Painting and Decorating, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona and Frank G. Murphy, John Ahearn, Bruce Thoeny, as members of said Commission, Defendant Insurance Carrier and James Leather, Applicant, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Rehearing Denied October 2, 1968.

Review Denied November 12, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.H. Chester, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Robert D. Steckner, Chief Counsel by, Michael A. Lasher, Jr., Phoenix, for respondent, Industrial Commission.

Hughes, Hughes & Conlan, by, John C. Hughes, Phoenix, for respondent James Leather.

STEVENS, Judge.

The two questions which are presented in connection with the review of the Award of The Industrial Commission are:

Whether the Respondent Leather was an employee of the petitioner Bratton; and

Whether Bratton had three or more employees so as to bring him within the mandatory provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act.

The Industrial Commission resolved both of these questions adversely to Bratton. We recognize that the Industrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases