DIMMOCK v. NEW LONDON


157 Conn. 9 (1968)

CHARLES F. DIMMOCK ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW LONDON

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 9, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard F. Corkey, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Edmund J. Eshenfelder, for the appellee (defendant).

KING, C. J., ALCORN, HOUSE, THIM and RYAN, JS.


HOUSE, J.

The plaintiffs, who are riparian owners along the course of Harris Brook and one of its source streams known as Fraser Brook, in Salem, instituted this action to enjoin the defendant from diverting water from a branch of Fraser Brook and to recover damages for the diversion already made.

The finding, with the addition of such admitted and undisputed facts as the plaintiffs are entitled to have included,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases