1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 101 N.J.
  5. 101 N.J. Super. 61 (1968)
 

GRAULICH CATERER INC. v. HANS HOLTERBOSCH

101 N.J. Super. 61 (1968)

243 A.2d 253

GRAULICH CATERER INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HANS HOLTERBOSCH, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 15, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John J. Flynn argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Thomas E. Durkin, Jr. attorney).

Mr. Samuel Weitzman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weitzman, Brady & Weitzman, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, caterers, take this appeal from a judgment for defendant rejecting plaintiff's suit sounding in contract. Entering this order, the trial court determined the relationship of the parties to be noncontractual, finding that a "letter of intent" signed by defendant and containing "open terms essential to a contract of this nature, did not constitute a contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases