These are two applications: (1) By respondents to determine "why the subpœna dated November 27, 1967, issued from Lloyd Hurst, Commissioner of Human Rights, directed to Elmer Walter should not be quashed, vacated and set aside" (First above set forth); and (2) by petitioner "for an order pursuant to CPLR § 2308(b) directing the respondent to comply with a subpœna ad testificandum...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.