1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 414 F.2d
  5. 414 F.2d 1111 (1968)
 

RICKS v. UNITED STATES

No. 20919A.

414 F.2d 1111 (1968)

Hattie Mae RICKS and Joseph N. Williams, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 23, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Monroe H. Freedman and Sol Rosen, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Ralph J. Temple, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Theodore Wieseman, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker and Earl J. Silbert, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before TAMM, LEVENTHAL and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges.

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:

In Ricks v. District of Columbia (Ricks I),1 decided today, we hold that three subsections of the District of Columbia's "general vagrancy" law2 are unconstitutionally vague. Before us now is a similar challenge3 to the "narcotic vagrancy" act4 in operation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases