1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 293 F.Supp.
  5. 293 F.Supp. 1190 (1968)
 

DeCICCO v. UNIROYAL, INC.

Civ. Nos. 67-232, 67-355, 67-365.

293 F.Supp. 1190 (1968)

Mike DeCICCO, dba Mike DeCicco & Son, Plaintiff, v. UNIROYAL, INC., a corporation, aka United States Rubber Company, a corporation, Defendant, v. Margaret M. DeCICCO, Third Party Defendant. P. W. MacNAB and Helen MacNab, dba MacNab Tire Service, Plaintiffs, v. UNIROYAL, INC., a corporation, aka United States Rubber Company, a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Oregon.

October 24, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger G. Tilbury, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Norman J. Wiener, King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Portland, Or., for defendant.

OPINION AND FINDINGS

KILKENNY, District Judge.

In this proceeding on the issues segregated for separate trial, DeCicco asserts that Uniroyal breached its contract by selling him defective tires. DeCicco claims that he was unable to collect the purchase price or was required to make adjustments with his customers for the defective tires, and that many customers discontinued doing business with him, to his damage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases