1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 297 F.Supp.
  5. 297 F.Supp. 1165 (1968)
 

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY v. HUTTON

Civ. No. 15098.

297 F.Supp. 1165 (1968)

The JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY v. James M. HUTTON, Jr., et al.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

Supplementary Opinion December 10, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund P. Dandridge, Jr., John Henry Lewin and Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

John F. King, Baltimore, Md., John A. Wilson, Michael J. DeSantis and Shearman & Sterling, New York City, for defendants.

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The Johns Hopkins University (Hopkins) seeks summary judgment over the vigorous opposition of defendants. The record is voluminous; the cast of characters is numerous; and the narration of the opposing versions of an unusual financial tale could easily outlast several double features. Defendants contend that the case is too complex for summary judgment. The answer to that contention, however, is easily discerned after the material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases