ADAMS DAIRY CO. v. NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP.

Nos. 11994-1, 12028-1, 12588-1, 12770-1, 12771-1, 12909-1, 12910-1, 14916-1, 15032-1, 15037-1, 15285-1, 15386-1, 16513-1, 16933-1, 16939-1, 16960-1.

293 F.Supp. 1168 (1968)

ADAMS DAIRY COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D.

December 13, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry P. Thomson, Jr., Robert R. Raymond and George Leonard, William A. Collet, Kansas City, Mo., for Adams Dairy Co. and others.

John R. Cleary, Kansas City, Mo., for Juanita Duggins and others.

William H. Sanders and William W. LaRue, Kansas City, Mo., for Frank Bott, and others.

James Wheeler, Keytesville, Mo., and Duke Ponick, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for Leroy Arnsperger and Helen Arnsperger.

John C. Dods, Kansas City, Mo., for Freddy Powell Meyer.

Martin J. Purcell, James C. Mordy, John E. Besser, Kansas City, Mo., Richard W. McLaren, David L. Aufderstrasse, Chicago, Ill., for National Dairy Products Corp.

Joseph J. Kelly, Jr., Howard F. Sachs, Kansas City, Mo., Joseph A. Greaves, Chicago, Ill., E. Clark Davis, New York City, for Borden, Inc.

Roy P. Swanson, John C. Thurlo, John J. Kitchin, Kansas City, Mo., William G. Wald, Omaha, Neb., Richard Whiting, Washington, D. C., for Fairmont Foods Co. and Country Club Dairy Co.

Robert D. Sandifer, Kansas City, Mo., John P. Stevens, Chicago, Ill., for Meyer Sanitary Milk Co.

Thomas E. Deacy, Jr., and John H. Ross, III, Kansas City, Mo., for Beatrice Foods Co.

Charles F. Lamkin, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., appearing specially on behalf of Foremost-McKesson, Inc., successor to Foremost Dairies, Inc. and Foremost Food Chemical Co.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS

JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.

Defendants National Dairy Products Corporation and Borden, Inc. have moved pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) for an order requiring plaintiffs to give security for defendants' costs, including their costs to be incurred in responding to plaintiffs' nationwide discovery requests.

Defendants' motion contends that "if it is found that the plaintiffs' claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases