LITTLE v. MACKEL

No. 11384.

443 P.2d 891 (1968)

George LITTLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Joseph MACKEL, Defendant and APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided July 24, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wade Dahood and Conde F. Mackay, argued, Anaconda, for appellant.

Chester L. Jones, argued, Virginia City, for respondent.


JOHN C. HARRISON, Justice.

This appeal results from a judgment of the district court of the fifth judicial district, the Honorable Philip C. Duncan sitting without a jury.

Certain procedural matters must be set forth in order to understand the appellant's issue of error. This case went to trial on the amended complaint of respondent which sought specific performance of the option provision of a lease and option agreement between respondent and appellant. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases