KITCHIN v. MORI

No. 5373.

437 P.2d 865 (1968)

Donald M. KITCHIN, Appellant, v. Tulio MORI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

March 4, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon W. Rice, Reno, for appellant.

Diehl, Recanzone & Evan, Fallon, for respondent.


OPINION

ZENOFF, Justice:

This was a suit by a buyer, Kitchin, for return of moneys paid as deposit and down payment for the purchase of a business. The trial court dismissed the complaint after presentation of the buyer's evidence on the ground that he had failed to prove a sufficient case for the court upon the facts and the law, and also that no basis for restitution had been proved.

In May 1965, Kitchin and Mori entered into negotiations for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases